The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Opinion Threads can’t kill Twitter. Only Twitter can do that.

(Dado Ruvic/Reuters)
5 min

A word to the web: Quit wondering whether Meta’s new microblogging app Threads is the “Twitter killer” we’ve all been waiting for. The only app with a chance of killing Twitter today is Twitter itself.

Threads debuted on Wednesday when Twitter was already suffering from a self-inflicted blow: owner Elon Musk’s decision to limit the tweets that nonpaying users could see every day to a stingy 600. The debut is only the latest of many would-be rivals, from Mastodon to Bluesky to conservative upstarts Gab and Parler and even Donald Trump’s personal bully pulpit, Truth Social.

None of the challengers has managed to land the coup de grâce — and it’s unlikely they ever will. They can’t capture the same sense of conflict; there are too many of them for any to feel like the one essential place to be; and most of all, everyone is still too obsessed with Twitter to give something new a chance.

Understanding why Twitter won’t just die already requires understanding what made it so alive to start with. One answer comes from Musk himself: “It is infinitely preferable to be attacked by strangers on Twitter than indulge in the false happiness of hide-the-pain Instagram.”

What we love and hate about Threads, Meta’s new Twitter clone

He has a point: Just as Gab and Parler never managed to take off because you can’t troll the libs where there aren’t any libs, now it’s fair to wonder whether the libs kind of liked being trolled. Or at least, the back-and-forth, urged on by algorithms with a bias toward the sensational, was what kept everyone, regardless of political affiliation, posting.